ANALISIS KAIDAH DAN DHOWABITH DALAM PENAFSIRAN KALIMAT AL-QUR’AN

STUDI KUALITATIF BERBASIS TADABBUR

Authors

  • Muhammad Yasir STIQ Ar-Rahman Bogor
  • Budi Suhartawan STIQ Ar-Rahman Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62359/tafakkur.v6i02.1273

Keywords:

Qur’anic Interpretation, Tadabbur, Qawāʿid, Ḍawābiṭ, Integrative Tafsir

Abstract

This study investigates the application of qawāʿid (principles) and ḍawābiṭ (methodological parameters) in interpreting Qur’anic expressions through a tadabbur-based approach. The study addresses a critical gap in contemporary Qur’anic studies, namely the tendency toward partial and overly literal interpretations that prioritize linguistic analysis while neglecting the integration of authoritative interpretative sources. This research aims to develop a systematic and integrative framework for understanding Qur’anic language that is both methodologically sound and contextually relevant. Employing a qualitative method with a library research design, this study analyzes classical and contemporary tafsir literature to identify patterns, principles, and interpretative structures. The findings demonstrate that valid Qur’anic interpretation requires the integration of three key dimensions: linguistic analysis, contextual understanding (siyaq), and authoritative sources, including the Qur’an, hadith, and interpretations of early Muslim scholars. Furthermore, this study proposes a multi-layered and cyclical interpretative model, in which interpretation begins with the Qur’an, is clarified through hadith and early authorities, analyzed via linguistic and contextual approaches, and ultimately revalidated against the Qur’an. This model serves as a methodological control mechanism to ensure interpretative accuracy and prevent deviation. The study contributes to Qur’anic hermeneutics by offering an integrative framework that bridges classical scholarship and contemporary interpretative needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Zayd, N. H. (1990). Mafhūm al-naṣṣ: Dirāsah fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyyah al-‘Āmmah li al-Kitāb.

Al-Aṣfahānī, A. R. (2005). Al-mufradāt fī gharīb al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam.

Al-Dhahabī, M. Ḥ. (2005). Al-tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth.

Al-Haqiqy, M. S. (2024). Hadits sebagai salah satu sumber hukum Islam yang muttafaq. MIJ, 2(8), 445–452.

Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1999). Kayfa nata‘āmal ma‘a al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Kairo: Dār al-Shurūq.

Al-Qattan, M. (2000). Mabāḥits fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

Al-Qurṭubī, M. A. (2006). Al-jāmi‘ li aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Suyūṭī, J. (2008). Al-itqān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Ṭabarī, M. J. (2001). Jāmi‘ al-bayān ‘an ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Zarkashī, B. D. (1957). Al-burhān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah.

Al-Zarqānī, M. ‘A. A. (2001). Manāhil al-‘irfān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as philosophy of Islamic law. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.

Esack, F. (1997). Qur’an, liberation and pluralism. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method. London: Continuum.

Hallaq, W. B. (1997). A history of Islamic legal theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ibn Jinnī. (t.t.). Al-khaṣā’iṣ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Kathīr, I. U. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Taymiyyah. (1999). Muqaddimah fī uṣūl al-tafsīr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Izutsu, T. (2002). Ethico-religious concepts in the Qur’an. Montreal: McGill University Press.

Mustaqim, A. (2012). Studi Al-Qur’an: Teori dan aplikasinya dalam penafsiran. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas: Texas Christian University Press.

Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a contemporary approach. London: Routledge.

Shihab, M. Q. (2007). Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Suhartawan, Budi. (2022). Konsep Tadabbur Al-Qur’an Perspektif Kh. Bachtiar Nasir. Tafakkur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir Vol. 3 No. 01 / Oktober 2022: 26-45.

Suryanto. (2012). Pemetaan kajian tafsir masa klasik. Jurnal Mutawâtir, 2(1), 96–108.

Zaidan, A. K. (1996). Al-wajīz fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-20

How to Cite

Yasir, M., & Suhartawan, B. (2026). ANALISIS KAIDAH DAN DHOWABITH DALAM PENAFSIRAN KALIMAT AL-QUR’AN: STUDI KUALITATIF BERBASIS TADABBUR. TAFAKKUR : Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 6(02), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.62359/tafakkur.v6i02.1273

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>