PROBLEM AUTENTISITAS HADIS DALAM KAJIAN KONTEMPORER
TINJAUAN LITERATUR ATAS KRITIK SANAD-MATAN, PENDEKATAN HISTORIS, DAN AUTENTIKASI DIGITAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62359/dirayah.v6i02.1346Keywords:
Digital Authentication, Hadith Authenticity, Matn Criticism, Sanad CriticismAbstract
The study of hadith authenticity is one of the central issues in hadith studies because it is directly related to the validity of traditions attributed to Prophet Muhammad. This study aims to map the problem of hadith authenticity in contemporary academic literature using the Systematic Literature Review method. The data were obtained from scholarly journal articles relevant to hadith authenticity, hadith criticism, hadith historicity, and digital hadith authentication. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis by classifying the literature based on research focus, method, main findings, and contribution to hadith studies. The findings show that the problem of hadith authenticity can be mapped into several layers, namely transmission problems, matn substance problems, historicity problems, scholarly authority problems, and the problem of hadith dissemination in digital spaces. Sanad criticism and matn criticism remain the main foundations of hadith authentication, while common link theory anisnad-cum-matn analysis contribute to a more critical understanding of the historical transmission of hadith. Digital authentication emerges as a response to the spread of hadith in digital media, but it still requires methodological validation from classical hadith sciences. This study emphasizes the need for an integrative model of hadith authenticity that combines transmission validation, textual-substantive validation, historical analysis, and digital technology.
Downloads
References
Abdelaal, H. (2019). Hadith Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques According To Its Reliability.
Abu-Alabbas, B. (2017). The Principles Of Hadith Criticism In The Writings Of Al-Shāfiʿī And Muslim. Islamic Law and Society, 24(4), 311–335.
Ali, M. A. M., Ibrahim, M. N., Usman, A. H., Nazri, M. A., & Kadir, M. N. A. (2015). Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil (Criticism And Praise): It’s Significant In The Science Of Hadith. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), S1.
Amir, A. M., Akbar, A., Ainurrofiq, F., & Sempo, M. W. (2021). Analizing Isnad-Cum-Matn Of Tauḥid Phrase On Prophet’s Flag Hadith. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 22(1), 67–92.
Bahrudin, M., Suliaman, I., & Adnan, M. A. M. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on Hadith Authentication Between Year 2000 To 2021. HADIS, 13(25), 55–69.
Binbeshr, F., Kamsin, A., & Mohammed, M. (2021). A Systematic Review On Hadith Authentication And Classification Methods. Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 20(2), 1–17.
Brown, J. (2008). How We Know Early Hadīth Critics Did Matn Criticism and Why It’s So Hard to Find. Islamic Law and Society, 15(2), 143–184.
Brown, J. A. C. (2011). The Canonization Of Ibn Mâjah: Authenticity Vs. Utility In The Formation Of The Sunni Ḥadîth Canon. Revue Des Mondes Musulmans et de La Méditerranée, 129, 169–181.
Brown, J. A. C. (2012). The Rules of Matn Criticism: There Are No Rules. Islamic Law and Society, 19(4), 356–396.
Çalgan, M. A. (2019). Hadislerin Tercüme ve Yorumunda Dikkat Edilmesi Gereken Esaslar ve Sık Rastlanan Hatalar. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(40), 517–551. https://doi.org/10.17335/SAKAIFD.574261
Dozan, W., & Fahrurazi, F. (2020). Hadiths Scepticism Authenticity (Critique to Orientalist Gautier HA Juynbool in Common Link Theory). Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 17(1), 19–37.
Duderija, A. (2009). Evolution in the canonical Sunni Hadith body of literature and the concept of an authentic Hadith during the formative period of Islamic ought as based on recent Western scholarship. Arab Law Quarterly, 23(4), 389–415.
Engin, S. (2015). The Methodological Approach To Sanad And Text Authenticity Relationship In The Context Of Hidden And Outlandish Content About Verification Of Hadith. Sakarya Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi-Journal Of Sakarya University Faculty Of Theology, 17(31).
Fadele, A. A., Kamsin, A., Ahmad, K., & Hamid, H. (2022). A Novel Classification To Categorise Original Hadith Detection Techniques. International Journal of Information Technology, 14(5), 2361–2375.
Fadele, A. A., Kamsin, A., Ahmad, K., & Rasheed, R. A. (2021). A Novel Hadith Authentication Mobile System in Arabic to Malay Language Translation for Android and iOS Phones. International Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 1683–1692.
Ghanem, M., Mouloudi, A., & Mourchid, M. (2016). Classification Of Hadiths Using LVQ Based On VSM Considering Words Order. International Journal of Computer Applications, 148(4).
Ghazizadeh, M., Zahedi, M. H., Kahani, M., & Bidgoli, B. M. (2008). Fuzzy Expert System In Determining Hadith1 Validity. In advances in computer and information sciences and engineering (pp. 354–359). Springer.
Haitomi, F., & Syachrofi, M. (2020). Aplikasi Teori Isnad Cum Matn Harald Motzki Dalam Hadis Misoginis Penciptaan Perempuan. Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 3(1), 29–55.
Hakak, S., Kamsin, A., Zada Khan, W., Zakari, A., Imran, M., bin Ahmad, K., & Amin Gilkar, G. (2022). Digital Hadith Authentication: Recent Advances, Open Challenges, And Future Directions. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 33(6), e3977.
Hallaq, W. B. (1999). The Authenticity of Prophetic Ḥadîth: A Pseudo-Problem. Studia Islamica, 75–90.
Kabir, M. N., Hasan, M. M., Rahman, M. A., & Tao, H. (2018). Development Of A Web-Extension For Authentication Of Online Hadith Texts. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.5), 19–22.
Karim, N. S. A., & Hazmi, N. R. (2005). Assessing Islamic Information Quality On The Internet: A Case Of Information About Hadith. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(2), 51–66.
Kaya, M. (2019). Reasons To Prefer Sanad Criticism For Hadith Identification.
Khan, I. A. (2011). Muslim Scholars’ Contribution In Hadith Authentication. Journal of Islam in Asia (E-ISSN 2289-8077), 8, 345–363.
Luthfi, E. T., Suryana, N., & Basari, A. H. (2018). Digital Hadith Authentication: A Literature Review And Analysis. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 96(15).
Masrur, A. (2017). Neo-Skeptisisme Michael Cook Dan Norman Calder Terhadap Hadis Nabi Muhammad. Jurnal Theologia, 28(1), 1–28.
Mehfooz, M. (2021). Women and Ḥadīth Transmission: Prolific Role of Aisha in Validation and Impugnment of Prophetic Traditions. Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 19(2), 200–227.
Mohamed, E., & Sarwar, R. (2022). Linguistic Features Evaluation For Hadith Authenticity Through Automatic Machine Learning. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(3), 830–843.
Motzki, H. (1991). The Muṣannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Sanʿānī as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Century AH. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 50(1), 1–21.
Motzki, H. (2005). Dating Muslim Traditions: A Survey. Arabica, 52(Fasc. 2), 204–253.
Mufid, A. (2017). Dating Hadits Tentang Persaksian Melihat Hilal: Telaah atas Isnad Cum Matn Analysis Harald Motzki. Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 2(1), 85–104.
Najeeb, M. M. (2014). Towards Innovative System For Hadith Isnad Processing. Int J Comput Trends Technol, 18(6), 257–259.
Nawafil, M. (2021). Revitalization of Theoretical Response Study of Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht Hadith Criticism. Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 116–140.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline For Reporting Systematic Reviews. Bmj, 372.
Saloot, M. A., Idris, N., Mahmud, R., Ja’afar, S., Thorleuchter, D., & Gani, A. (2016). Hadith Data Mining And Classification: A Comparative Analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review, 46(1), 113–128.
Scheiner, J. (2019). Isnād-Cum-Matn Analysis And Kalāla: Some Critical Reflections.
Siswanto, D. (2020). The Paradigm of Matn Hadith Criticism and Its Transformation in the Modern Era. Ulul Albab, 21(1), 130.
Suliaman, I., Zulkipli, S. N., Ramlan, A. M., Anas, N., Ahmat, A., Aziz, N., & Yaakob, M. A. Z. (2018). The Convenience Of Takhrij Al-Hadith Through ICT Apps: An Exploratory Analysis On Selected Hadith Website And Mobile Apps. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(11), 2649–2660.
Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., Aeni, A. N., & Sumarna, E. (2020). Action Research In Hadith Literacy: A Reflection Of Hadith Learning In The Digital Age. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 99–124.
Suwarno, R. W. (2018). Kesejarahan Hadis dalam Tinjauan Teori Common Link. Jurnal Living Hadis, 89–120.
Wan Kamal Nadzif, W. J., & Noor Aileen, I. (2014). Ibn Hajar’s Critique Of Lenient In Hadith Upon The Muslim Transmitters: A Study On ‘Abdullah B. Abi Salih (D. 130/744). Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 4(2), 71–78.
Wangsa, F. A., & Ramadhan, M. (2021). Kajian Otentisitas Hadis Dalam Pandangan Mustafa Ali Yaqub. Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam, 23(2).
Wazna, R. (2018). Metode Kontemporer Menggali Otentisitas Hadis (Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 17(2), 112–125.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yoga Mahath Pandika, Nur Efendi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
